I have tried to put forward the summary of my understanding from the movie! Why am I mentioning a movie on this blog? Because those 96 intense minutes have a lot to convey, which can, if closely observed, change our perspective towards the very objectives we construct for ourselves. People who have seen the movie can relate to the article very well, for the rest I highly recommend watching this movie.
The book mentioned an activity where readers were requested to watch this black and white classic on group dynamics. I have to say, the 96 intense and claustrophobic minutes of this classic hit tell a lot about leadership, decision-making, team-building, and behavioural analysis.
For those of you who have watched it would be able to relate to the blog. It is about a jury of 12 different individuals from distinct backgrounds; given the task of deciding unanimous whether the boy is guilty or not.
It is a perfect portrayal of how people act in groups and what all phases teams go through before reaching to a unanimous decision. Viewers can learn a lot about how people working within communities and organizations can influence others for the better.
This is a great example of empathizing with others. The same holds true during meets and discussions. Try to find the reason behind why people are saying what they are saying.
Empathizing makes you see the bigger picture more clearly! Choosing right over easy! But he saw what was at stake — the life of a potentially innocent boy. So, he decided to go with the difficult path which meant not only standing against the rest 11 jurors, but also changing their behaviour without disrespecting their opinions.
So, during discussions, try to come out of the shell, break free of our comfort zone, and take a stand!
Tone matters After watching 12 Angry Men, I realized that the most influential jurors who were able to make a point were the ones who maintained a steady and calm disposition throughout the discussion. Those who kept yelling, lost their temper, shouted, and attempted to impose their views and arguments were the ones to soon lose their persuasive ability.
Short-tempered and aggressive folks did make an impact — just not the one they really wanted to. Assertiveness, right tone of voice, and putting your arguments with conviction is the way to make a point.
Having a different perspective People vs. Where do you belong? I know the latter is not a standard dictionary word, but you get the point, right! Fonda delivered an outstanding performance depicting how he chose to have a different opinion when the odds were Most people fail to put forward their views out of fear of ridicule or rejection.
Try to avoid herd behaviour. Gather the courage to get your message through, even if it means standing against the ridicule of others.
Giving time to important decisions When the jurors gathered, eleven of them just wanted to get it over with. So they chose to do the easy thing of voting the boy guilty without offering any insight into the matter.
If a decision is important, devote plenty of time. In the movie, the life of a boy was at stake.
Leadership lessons to learn from 12 Angry Men — the movie The first time I got to know about “12 Angry Men” was a few years back when I was reading one of the best books on management. The book mentioned an activity where readers were requested to watch . The series seeks to explore leadership through the lens of selected movies. Today we are looking at the movie Twelve Angry Men directed by Sidney Lumet and featuring Henry Fonda as Davies. I always recommend you watch the movie before reading the analysis (so as not to spoil a great movie). A young boy is on trial for murder, accused of knifing his father to death. The twelve jurors retire to the jury room, having been admonished that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Eleven of the jurors vote for conviction, each for reasons of their own. The.
Find out what the stakes are and accordingly plan discussions and move ahead with conversations! Nudging others You cannot impose your views.Leadership in 12 Angry Men Why was Juror 8 an overall effective leader?
Juror 12 Advertising Man Juror 5 Man With Slum Background Techniques Used. The series seeks to explore leadership through the lens of selected movies.
Today we are looking at the movie Twelve Angry Men directed by Sidney Lumet and featuring Henry Fonda as Davies. I always recommend you watch the movie before reading the analysis (so as not to spoil a great movie). Leadership: In the movie 12 Angry Men there were two primary examples of leadership.
The first was in the beginning of the movie, when the foreman gets everyone together in the room and has them sit down, assigning them each a number. In the film 12 Angry Men, a group of twelve jurors are deciding the fate of a young boy accused of murdering his father.
Throughout the juries dilleration, one man exhibits all of the qualities of leadership. A platform for budding marketers! If you love #marketing and passionate about #transforming businesses, you have come the right place; take a few moments and navigate around the site.
This is a web address you would love to click-around each day for new stuff & build your marketing appetite. Leadership: In the movie 12 Angry Men there were two primary examples of leadership.
The first was in the beginning of the movie, when the foreman gets everyone together in the room and has them sit down, assigning them each a number.