My claim is actually the opposite:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not an instruction manual, guidebook, or textbook. Wikipedia articles should not read like: This includes tutorials, instruction manuals, game guides, and recipes.
Describing to the reader how people or things use or do something is encyclopedic; instructing the reader in the imperative mood about how to use or do something is not.
Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like. Notable locations may meet the inclusion criteria, but the resulting articles need not include every tourist attraction, restaurant, hotel or venue, etc.
While travel guides for a city will often mention distant attractions, a Wikipedia article for a city should only list those that are actually in the city. If you do wish to help write a travel guide, your contributions would be welcome at our sister project, Wikivoyage. An article about a video game should briefly summarize the story and the main actions the player performs in the game; however, avoid lists of gameplay weapons, items, or concepts, unless these are notable as discussed in secondary sources in their own right in gaming context such as the BFG from the Doom series.
Walk-throughs or detailed coverage of specific point values, achievements, time-limits, levels, types of enemies, character moves, character weight classes, and so on are also considered inappropriate.
A concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry.
See the Current events portal for examples. Wikipedia articles should not list frequently asked questions FAQs. Instead, format the information as neutral prose within the appropriate article s. Textbooks and annotated texts. Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference, not a textbook.
The purpose of Wikipedia is to present facts, not to teach subject matter. It is not appropriate to create or edit articles that read as textbooks, with leading questions and systematic problem solutions as examples. These belong on our sister projects, such as WikibooksWikisourceand Wikiversity.
Some kinds of examples, specifically those intended to inform rather than to instruct, may be appropriate for inclusion in a Wikipedia article.
Introductory language in the lead and sometimes the initial sections of the article should be written in plain terms and concepts that can be understood by any literate reader of Wikipedia without any knowledge in the given field before advancing to more detailed explanations of the topic.
While wikilinks should be provided for advanced terms and concepts in that field, articles should be written on the assumption that the reader will not or cannot follow these links, instead attempting to infer their meaning from the text.
Texts should be written for everyday readers, not just for academics. Article titles should reflect common usagenot academic terminology, whenever possible. Many topics are based on the relationship of factor X to factor Y, resulting in one or more full articles. For example, this could refer to situation X in location Y, or version X of item Y.
This is perfectly acceptable when the two variables put together represent some culturally significant phenomenon or some otherwise notable interest. Often, separate articles are needed for a subject within a range of different countries, due to substantial differences across international borders; articles such as " Slate industry in Wales " and " Island fox " are fitting examples.
Writing about " Oak trees in North Carolina " or " Blue trucks ", however, would likely constitute a POV fork or original researchand would certainly not result in an encyclopedic article. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.Apr 03, · The story behind the essay, however, was more complicated than we thought.
According to ESPN’s source, what the network’s cameras captured was not . I am (or at least think I am) an expert. Not on everything, but in a particular area of human knowledge, specifically social science and public policy.
I am (or at least think I am) an expert. Not on everything, but in a particular area of human knowledge, specifically social science and public policy.
John Locke (—) John Locke was among the most famous philosophers and political theorists of the 17 th century.
He is often regarded as the founder of a school of thought known as British Empiricism, and he made foundational contributions to modern theories of limited, liberal government. not real Essays: Over , not real Essays, not real Term Papers, not real Research Paper, Book Reports.
ESSAYS, term and research papers available for UNLIMITED access. The Part 1 question will be an essay on a given topic. A set of notes on the topic will be provided, and will include three bullet points.
Candidates will be asked to select two of the bullet points and to base their essay on those two points.